1. Authentication
- Brute Force
- Insufficient Authentication
- Weak Password Recovery Validation
2. Authorization
- Credential/Session Prediction
- Insufficient Authorization
- Insufficient Session Expiration
- Session Fixation
3. Client-side Attacks
- Content Spoofing
- Cross-site Scripting
4. Command Execution
- Buffer Overflow
- Format String Attack
- LDAP Injection
- OS Commanding
- SQL Injection
- SSI Injection
- XPath Injection
5. Information Disclosure
- Directory Indexing
- Information Leakage
- Path Traversal
- Predictable Resource Location
6. Logical Attacks
- Abuse of Functionality
- Denial of Service
- Insufficient Anti-automation
- Insufficient Process Validation
|
 |
Content Spoofing
Content Spoofing is an attack technique used to trick a user into
believing that certain content appearing on a web site is legitimate
and not from an external source. Some web pages are served using dynamically built HTML content
sources. For example, the source location of a frame <![CDATA[<frame src="http://foo.example/file.html">]]> could be specified
by a URL parameter value.
(http://foo.example/page?frame_src=http://foo.example/file.html). An attacker may be able to replace the "frame_src" parameter value with "frame_src=http://attacker.example/spoof.html". When the resulting web page is served, the browser location bar visibly remains under the user expected domain (foo.example), but the foreign data (attacker.example) is shrouded by legitimate
content.
Specially crafted links can be sent to a user via e-mail, instant
messages, left on bulletin board postings, or forced upon users by a
Cross-site Scripting attack. If an attacker gets a user to visit a web
page designated by their malicious URL, the user will believe he is
viewing authentic content from one location when he is not. Users will
implicitly trust the spoofed content since the browser location bar
displays http://foo.example, when in fact the underlying HTML
frame is referencing http://attacker.example.
This attack exploits the trust relationship established between the
user and the web site. The technique has been used to create fake
web pages including login forms, defacements, false press releases,
etc.
Example
Creating a spoofed press release. Lets say a web site uses
dynamically created HTML frames for their press release web pages.
A user would visit a link such as: (http://foo.example/pr?pg=http://foo.example/pr/01012003.html).
The resulting web page HTML would be:
<![CDATA[
Code Snippet:
<HTML>
<FRAMESET COLS="100,*">
<FRAME NAME="pr_menu" SRC="menu.html">
<FRAME NAME="pr_content" SRC="http://foo.example/pr/01012003.html">
</FRAMESET>
</HTML>
]]>
The "pr" web application in the example above creates the HTML
with a static menu and a dynamically generated FRAME SRC. The
"pr_content" frame pulls its source from the URL parameter value
of "pg" to display the requested press release content. But what if an
attacker altered the normal URL to:
http://foo.example/pr?pg=http://attacker.example/spoofed_press_release.html?
Without properly sanity checking the "pg" value, the resulting HTML would be:
<![CDATA[
Code Snippet:
<HTML>
<FRAMESET COLS="100,*">
<FRAME NAME="pr_menu" SRC="menu.html">
<FRAME NAME="pr_content" SRC="
http://attacker.example/spoofed_press_release.html">
</FRAMESET>
</HTML>
]]>
To the end user, the "attacker.example" spoofed content appears
authentic and delivered from a legitimate source.
References
"A new spoof: all frames-based sites are vulnerable" - SecureXpert
Labs
http://tbtf.com/archive/11-17-98.html#s02
To receive your Free Application Vulnerability Assessment for testing of one attack vulnerability of your choice, please submit your payment of $1999.00 for a second Content Spoofing attack vulnerability test.
|
